Sometimes I’ll see several manuscripts in a row that have a lot of potential but have something missing, and I’ll wish that the authors had spent a little more time revising before submitting them. Revising can seem daunting – it’s less exciting than writing the actual book and it can be easier to focus on choosing a title, perfecting a query letter, researching agents, etc. And authors should definitely spend time on all of those things, but not at the expense of writing and rewriting the best book possible. Having the most beautiful query letter in the world or the perfect list of agents won’t help if the book isn’t strong on its own.
This is the most frustrating for editors when we see potential in books but aren’t sure if the author will be able to take it to the next level – maybe there are too many “if onlys”: if only the ending didn’t fall apart, if only the characters didn’t feel clichéd, if only something exciting happened before page 100, if only the dialog felt authentic… Even if an editor does believe in the project and sees the author’s vision, we then have to convince our acquisitions committee to make the leap of faith as well. Sometimes when we really love a project we are able to work with the author on a revision before acquisition, but we aren’t able to do that with most projects.
So my advice to authors is: revise as much as you can! When you revise, try to trust your instincts and not second guess yourself if there is something that doesn’t feel right to you. Try to step away from the manuscript for a little while as well – a few weeks or a month – so that you can come back to it with fresh eyes. It’s also helpful to ask other people you trust to read it – don’t be shy about sharing your work and asking for honest feedback.
Even though it can take a long time to go through various drafts and stages, revising will only give your manuscript a better chance to find the right agent, editor, and publisher!






